Stonehenge
On Sunday I took a day trip to Stonehenge and Bath with the Give-It-a-Go program here at Sheffield. Although it took four hours to reach Stonhenge by bus it was certainly worth it. However, if I was to be honest, I was sort of dissappointed at first. I mean if you don’t stop to contemplate the significance of the place, well, it really is just a bunch of stones in a circle. I got within perhaps 20 meters or so of the stones, just outside of a chain linked fence. I could have paid five pounds to get about five meters closer, but didn’t really feel the inclination to do so, primarily because I had only taken ten quid with me for the whole day. In retrospect I sort of wish that I had, because I would have been able to walk in a circle and hear a guided tour about the stones and their significance. However I was with some Australian friends and we were more interested in finding stones to climb and petting sheep than in learning about the site… although I did read a brochure and oooh and aaahh for a while from my position behind the fence.
However on the bus ride back I started talking to other people and became more interested in actually learning the history. So here it is, for my education and yours!
The following info is my selection of the interesting things from the brochure and from the ever-insightful Wikipedia:
Stonehenge lies nine miles north of Salisbury Hill in Wilshire. According to the brochure, Stonehenge was built over four major phases between 3200 BC and 1600 BC, although there is some evidence for activity both before and after that time. Stonehenge is probably the world’s earliest earthwork to contain specific lunar and solar alignments!
The first monument was built in 3100 BC and consisted of a circular bank and ditch enclosure made of Late Cretaceous Seaford chalk. There were also 56 pits dug around it which may have formed a timber circle, but there is no evidence remaining. However, the holes are known to have contained remains of cremation burials dating to 3000 -2800 BC, the second phase of the monument, making it the earliest known cremation cemetary in the British Isles!
Archaeologic evidence suggests that timber was abandoned for stone around 2600 BC. Two concentric crescents of holes were dug in the centre of the site and these holes held up to 80 standing bluestones. The stones each weighed about four tons and measured 2m in height. For most of the 20th century it was thought that these stones were transported by humans (!) from the Preseli Hills 250 km away in Wales. However the current theory is that they were brought from a much closer glacial deposit. It is thought that the stones were carried down to Southern England from Preselis by the Irish Sea Glacier (during the Ice Age). The north eastern entrance was also widened during in this third phase so that it precisely matched the direction of the midsummer sunrise and midsummer sunset of the period. At this time a monolithic six-ton sandstone, twice the height of the bluestones was also set in the centre. It is now known as the Altar Stone.
From 2400BC to 2100 BC, 30 enormous Sarsen stones were brought from a quarry around 24 miles north of Stonehenge, on the Marlborough Downs. The stones were fashioned with mortise and tenon joints (actually a woodworking method) with a ring of 30 lintel stones resting on top. The lintels were fitted to one another using a tongue and groove joint. The word henge may have come from the old English version of hinge because the stone lintels hinge on the upright stones. During this ambitious third phase, five trilithons of sarsen stone were also arranged in a horseshoe shape within the circle. The open end of the horseshoe faced northeast. In case you don’t know what a trilithon is (I didn’t) it is two large vertical stones supporting a third horizontal stone set on top. These huge stones, ten uprights and five lintels, weigh up to 50 tons each! The trilithons ranged from 20ft to 30ft tall, but of course they have sunk into the ground over the years and some have fallen. The largest upright stone still standing from the trilithons has 22ft visible above ground and 8ft below.
From 2280 BC to 1930 BC the bluestones were rearranged and some were placed in a circle between the two settings of sarsens and in an oval in the very centre. The Altar Stone may have been moved within the oval and stood vertically. Although this was probably the most impressive phase of work, it was shabbily built and most of the newly reinstalled bluestones soon began to fall over. However, only minor changes were made after this phase.
Even though the last known construction of Stonehenge was about 1600 BC, the last known usage of it was probably as late as the 7th century. This is confirmed by the excavation of a decapitated Saxon man from that time period. Roman coins, prehistoric pottery, and an unusual bone point have also been found, but scholars do not know if Stonehenge was in continuous use or exactly how it was used.
So that’s a brief history of Stonehenge. Trust me I tried to keep it brief and only put down the stuff I thought was interesting. I mean its all very interesting if you like learning about ancient civilizations, but its difficult to follow, especially if you start off not knowing your Neolithic from your Megalithic…
But it really is amazing to contemplate the engineering that must have gone into constructing Stonehenge. Especially considering the prehistoric time period it was constructed in and the relatively primitive technology. However they managed to build it, you have to give the people of that time credit. Apparently scholars are still trying to discover the full meaning and significance of the place, but its one of those things that might remain a mystery. Obviously its been used as a temple and a burial ground and a place for ritual, but beyond that little is known. My French flat-mate Elise actually paid the five quid and took the guided tour. Her tour guide said that the stones are arranged such that at a certain time the sun hits a different one each month… so it may have been used as a type of calender. One of my other flat-mates, Roseanne, is also very intrigued by Stonehenge because she is a pagan and she says that it has been used in the past for various pagan rituals and for worshipping the sun. Sadly she was unable to come because she teaches Dutch to English students and had to take a group of first years to Amsterdam over the weekend. They were of course very excited about the “coffee shops.”
Side note: The first years here party harder than anyone I know.
To conclude, I wish that I had been a little more reverent and that I had researched some of the history about Stonehenge before I went. When I got back I was talking to my friend Navid (the American from Iraq) and he sent me a link about the spiritual significance of Stonehenge and how it is viewed as a sacred place by many. Some “intuitives” believe that it is positioned at the centre of a hub, or network of energy lines called “ley” lines. Apparently there are 14 major lines that converge at Stonehenge. These are of course just metaphysical constructs created by drawing a line between two old ancient sites, or churches. I don’t know what I think of that as an idea, but it is interesting to contemplate. For example, one part of the article talks about a vortex (such as Stonehenge) as being a “neural node” in the Earth’s energy grid. So in that sense, the ley lines are like meridians on the surface of Earth. That is the analogy anyways.
However, at the same time I feel somewhat uneasy talking about it in those terms… not because I don’t believe there is energy there, but what type of energy it is… I’m not sure. I suppose it depends on your definition of sacred and how you feel about creating these sorts of energy lines. For example, the definition of sacred is “a state of being holy or sanctified, set apart for the worhip of God or gods.” Stonehenge is considered to be a sacred place and from the history it would seem logical to imagine that it was, at least during certain times, a place of ritualistic sacrifice, perhaps even human sacrifice. Of course many churches and abbeys are also considered to be sacred places or vortices and they are also places that I’m sure were filled with violence at some point, either physical, emotional or spiritual violence. So… I really have no conclusions, only a curiosity.

